Volume no :
|
Issue no :
Article Type :
Author :
Mr.Sidharth Sharma
Published Date :
Publisher :
Page No: 1 - 5
Abstract : Intense discussions concerning the hazards and ethical ramifications of artificial intelligence were sparked by its introduction and broad societal adoption. Traditional discriminative machine learning carries hazards that are frequently different from these risks. A scoping review on the ethics of artificial intelligence, with a focus on big language models and text-to-image models, was carried out in order to compile the recent discourse and map its normative notions. Enforcing accountability, responsibility, and adherence to moral and legal standards will become more challenging as artificial intelligence systems get more adept at making decisions on their own. Here, a user-centered, realism-inspired method is suggested to close the gap between abstract concepts and routine research procedures. It lists five particular objectives for the moral application of AI: 1) comprehending model training and output, including bias mitigation techniques; 2) protecting copyright, privacy, and secrecy; 3) avoiding plagiarism and policy infractions; 4) applying AI in a way that is advantageous over alternatives; and 5) employing AI in a transparent and repeatable manner. Every objective is supported by workable plans, real-world examples of abuse, and remedial actions. This paper will discuss the nature of an accountability framework and related concerns in order to enable the organized responsibility for assignment and proof of AI systems. The suggested architecture for regulating AI incorporates crucial components like transparency, human oversight, and adaptability to address the issues with accountability that have been brought to light. Some crucial suggestions for putting the framework into practice and growing it were also provided through industrial case studies, guaranteeing that companies increase compliance, trust, and responsible AI technology adoption.
Keyword Artificial intelligence, Accountability, AI, Ethics
Reference:
  1. Hunt, E. B. (2014). Artificial intelligence. Academic Press.
  2. Holmes, J., Sacchi, L., & Bellazzi, R. (2004). Artificial intelligence in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 86, 334-8.
  3. Winston, P. H. (1992). Artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc..
  4. Winston, P. H. (1984). Artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc..
  5. Boden, M. A. (Ed.). (1996). Artificial intelligence. Elsevier.

Thepade, D. S., Mandal, P. R., & Jadhav, S. (2015). Performance Comparison of Novel Iris Recognition Techniques Using Partial Energies of Transformed Iris Images and Enegy CompactionWith Hybrid Wavelet Transforms. In Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON).